HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Friday, August 27, 2010
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Apollo 11 Pilot Remembers
Mike Collins was interviewed about his experience as pilot of Apollo 11. Here are two questions and his answers.
Q. Turning to your flight, what is your strongest memory of Apollo 11?
A. Looking back at Earth from a great distance.
"I really believe that if the political leaders of the world could see their planet from a distance of 100,000 miles their outlook could be fundamentally changed. That all-important border would be invisible, that noisy argument silenced. The tiny globe would continue to turn, serenely ignoring its subdivisions, presenting a unified façade that would cry out for unified understanding, for homogeneous treatment. The earth must become as it appears: blue and white, not capitalist or Communist; blue and white, not rich or poor; blue and white, not envious or envied."
Small, shiny, serene, blue and white, FRAGILE.
Q. That was 40 years ago. Would it look the same today?
A. Yes, from the moon, but appearances can be deceiving. It's certainly not serene, but definitely fragile, and growing more so. When we flew to the moon, our population was 3 billion; today it has more than doubled and is headed for 8 billion, the experts say. I do not think this growth is sustainable or healthy.
The loss of habitat, the trashing of oceans, the accumulation of waste products - this is no way to treat a planet.
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Natural Gas Should Not Be a Transition Fuel
Mary Sweeney of Upstate NY, writing on the Susquehanna County Gas Forum online, writes:The gas industry has played up the possibility of using natural gas as a "transition" fuel. However, the gas locked up in the shale will take decades to extract. Moreover, that gas will be expensive to extract and extracting the gas presents very serious public health and environmental problems. In the end, even taking into account unconventional sources like shale gas and coal bed methane, this country does NOT possess that much natural gas in comparison to what is available in Russia and the Middle East.
If we convert more and more of our energy usage to natural gas, it will not be long before we are forced to turn to Russia and the Middle East for our natural gas. Meanwhile, we will have trashed some of our most valuable resources (e.g. water) in trying to squeeze more gas from the shale.Rather than investing a HUGE amount of money in drilling the shale and then trying to clean up the environmental and public health mess that results, it would make a great deal more sense to invest that money in renewable energy sources. And if we get truly serious about energy efficiency and conservation, we will use up less fossil fuel in the meantime. That is the way to make the transition--by using less coal, oil, and natural gas. A transition based on conservation can begin immediately, will help the environment rather than harming it, and will save people money, because using less energy costs less money. Needless to say, the fossil fuel industry has its own reasons for NOT wanting people to conserve--they would like us all to keep buying fossil fuel, regardless of the environmental and health problems that will result.
We don't need a transitional fuel. We need to understand that fossil fuel use is not the way to go forward, that we have already wasted several decades and a lot of money pretending that fossil fuel use could go on and on, and that we need to stop repeating past errors and get serious about conservation and renewable energy.
My sentiments exactly! -Peacegirl
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Public Watchdogs Don't Always Watch the Right Dog
In New York, we have the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Pennsylvania has its Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Texas has the Texas Railroad Commission (TRC). All three agencies are tasked with overseeing oil and gas drilling as well as the environment. The problem comes when one part of their job is eclipsed by the other. One of the big goals is to make money for the state through "responsible" drilling. But with money at a premium, the environmental part of the job gets short shrift every time. In Texas, it is even worse because the three Railroad commissioners are elected, not appointed. Their campaigns are funded big time by the energy corporations- the gas and oil industry.
A cursory investigation reveals that inspections are not done as required in many cases. Inspector positions are dwindling while wells are proliferating rapidly. Sometimes personnel doing inspections have absolutely no training in that field. In some cases, gas companies are allowed to do their own reporting, believe it or not. If they say there is no problem, or the problem has been fixed, the DEC or the DEP just accepts that as fact. Case closed.
Click here to read the story of a North Texas rancher who is convinced that the pristine waters of the Brazos River are polluted due to contamination of the Seymour Aquifer that flows under his ranch. The contamination is being caused by an abandoned gas processing plant located just 400 feet from the river's edge.
Now before you dismiss this story, and say that Texas is far away and doesn't have any relevance to us here in Bradford County, just remember that Texas got the gas wells first and is much further along than PA and NY. However, we are living atop a much, much bigger shale formation than the Barnett ever thought of being, and the gas drillers are drooling over what they are going to get out of our land. As soon as drilling rigs in Texas become available, they are sent post haste to Bradford County and other areas of PA to be set up here. With the rigs comes the work force from Texas, many of whom are immigrants from Mexico. They need the jobs, and the gas industry would rather keep them on rather than training a whole new work force.
It is very disillusioning to realize that environmental agencies of the government do not protect our waterways, our forests, our air, our beautiful vistas (those scenic views we pull off the road to see). They are in place primarily, though they would probably not admit it, to assist the gas industry. I'm not saying that there aren't some state employees who try to do their jobs and who care about the environment and public health. But the whole system is set up bassackwards in favor of gas drilling. This is not the way it should be, nor does it have to be. But it is the way it is being done right now. If you look at aerial photographs of some places in the west, it looks like a moonscape or a pin cushion. That is because the process of gas drilling starts small and becomes huge over time. According to Don Young of FWCanDO (Forth Worth),the two words to watch out for when dealing with the gas industry, are "FOR NOW." "This is all we want FOR NOW," they say. The landmen only tell you a tenth of what they know, and believe me, they know what you are in for. The leases only get you started on the path. Then you begin to see more and more: The additional wells drilled if a lot of gas is found in a particular place, the water pumping stations needed, the meter stations, the pipelines, the gas processing plants, the felling of trees, the sludge pits, the huge 80,000 pound trucks by the hundreds, the noise, the bright lights. All these things come with the territory, and no regulatory agency has the capacity to oversee it all. And, of course, the gas industry is the only polluter that does not have to follow the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, and other laws which protect us and the environment. In fact, there are less toxic ways of drilling and handling flowback water, and these methods are not being seriously considered at the moment because it is not the law.
WHEN GAS DRILLING BEGINS, OR WHEN THE FIRST TRUCK APPEARS, WHEN SEISMIC TESTING OCCURS, WHATEVER IS HAPPENING, LANDOWNERS WILL HAVE TO BE THEIR OWN WATCH DOGS. MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A VIDEO CAMERA AND A DIGITAL CAMERA. DOCUMENT WHAT YOU SEE. EXPECT THAT AT SOME POINT WE WILL HAVE TO GO TO COURT. THIS IS A BUSINESS, AND A FULL TIME ONE AT THAT.
A cursory investigation reveals that inspections are not done as required in many cases. Inspector positions are dwindling while wells are proliferating rapidly. Sometimes personnel doing inspections have absolutely no training in that field. In some cases, gas companies are allowed to do their own reporting, believe it or not. If they say there is no problem, or the problem has been fixed, the DEC or the DEP just accepts that as fact. Case closed.
Click here to read the story of a North Texas rancher who is convinced that the pristine waters of the Brazos River are polluted due to contamination of the Seymour Aquifer that flows under his ranch. The contamination is being caused by an abandoned gas processing plant located just 400 feet from the river's edge.
Now before you dismiss this story, and say that Texas is far away and doesn't have any relevance to us here in Bradford County, just remember that Texas got the gas wells first and is much further along than PA and NY. However, we are living atop a much, much bigger shale formation than the Barnett ever thought of being, and the gas drillers are drooling over what they are going to get out of our land. As soon as drilling rigs in Texas become available, they are sent post haste to Bradford County and other areas of PA to be set up here. With the rigs comes the work force from Texas, many of whom are immigrants from Mexico. They need the jobs, and the gas industry would rather keep them on rather than training a whole new work force.
It is very disillusioning to realize that environmental agencies of the government do not protect our waterways, our forests, our air, our beautiful vistas (those scenic views we pull off the road to see). They are in place primarily, though they would probably not admit it, to assist the gas industry. I'm not saying that there aren't some state employees who try to do their jobs and who care about the environment and public health. But the whole system is set up bassackwards in favor of gas drilling. This is not the way it should be, nor does it have to be. But it is the way it is being done right now. If you look at aerial photographs of some places in the west, it looks like a moonscape or a pin cushion. That is because the process of gas drilling starts small and becomes huge over time. According to Don Young of FWCanDO (Forth Worth),the two words to watch out for when dealing with the gas industry, are "FOR NOW." "This is all we want FOR NOW," they say. The landmen only tell you a tenth of what they know, and believe me, they know what you are in for. The leases only get you started on the path. Then you begin to see more and more: The additional wells drilled if a lot of gas is found in a particular place, the water pumping stations needed, the meter stations, the pipelines, the gas processing plants, the felling of trees, the sludge pits, the huge 80,000 pound trucks by the hundreds, the noise, the bright lights. All these things come with the territory, and no regulatory agency has the capacity to oversee it all. And, of course, the gas industry is the only polluter that does not have to follow the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, and other laws which protect us and the environment. In fact, there are less toxic ways of drilling and handling flowback water, and these methods are not being seriously considered at the moment because it is not the law.
WHEN GAS DRILLING BEGINS, OR WHEN THE FIRST TRUCK APPEARS, WHEN SEISMIC TESTING OCCURS, WHATEVER IS HAPPENING, LANDOWNERS WILL HAVE TO BE THEIR OWN WATCH DOGS. MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A VIDEO CAMERA AND A DIGITAL CAMERA. DOCUMENT WHAT YOU SEE. EXPECT THAT AT SOME POINT WE WILL HAVE TO GO TO COURT. THIS IS A BUSINESS, AND A FULL TIME ONE AT THAT.
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)